Concerning Sichieri R, Cunha DB: Obes Facts 2014;7:221-232. The Assertion that Controlling for Baseline (Pre-Randomization) Covariates in Randomized Controlled Trials Leads to Bias Is False

نویسندگان

  • Peng Li
  • Andrew W. Brown
  • John A. Dawson
  • Kathryn A. Kaiser
  • Michelle M. Bohan Brown
  • Scott W. Keith
  • J. Michael Oakes
  • David B. Allison
چکیده

a Office of Energetics and Nutrition Obesity Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL , USA; b Department of Food, Nutrition, and Packaging Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC , USA; c Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA , USA; d Division of Epidemiology and Minnesota Population Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN , USA

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Quality Management in Scientific Publishing – the Importance to Critically Scrutinize Scientific Work

On September 10, 2013, an article with the title ‘Unbalanced Baseline in School-Based Interventions to Prevent Obesity: Adjustment Can Lead to Bias?’ by the authors R. Sichieri and D. B. Cunha was submitted to our journal OBESITY FACTS . The reviewers of the original submission recommended that major revision was required before the publication could be accepted, specifically a stronger defense...

متن کامل

Authors’ response to Li et al. Obes Facts 2015;8:DOI: 10.159/000381434

Li et al. [1] have concerns regarding our statement that adjusting for the baseline values of parameters that are highly influenced by baseline values can bias the results in randomized studies. They argued that this is a standard procedure and that our study should be retracted mainly because it contradicts the epidemiology literature. Our study cannot be retracted exactly because it indicates...

متن کامل

Ensuring the comparability of comparison groups: is randomization enough?

BACKGROUND It is widely believed that baseline imbalances in randomized trials must necessarily be random. In fact, there is a type of selection bias that can cause substantial, systematic and reproducible baseline imbalances of prognostic covariates even in properly randomized trials. It is possible, given complete data, to quantify both the susceptibility of a given trial to this type of sele...

متن کامل

Unbalanced Baseline in School-Based Interventions to Prevent Obesity: Adjustment Can Lead to Bias – a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND/AIMS Cluster designs favor unbalanced baseline measures. The aim of the present study was to determine the frequency of unbalanced baseline BMI on school-based randomized controlled trials (RCT) aimed at obesity reduction and to evaluate the analysis strategies. We hypothesized that the adjustment of unbalanced baseline measures may explain the great discrepancy among studies. METH...

متن کامل

تصادفی سازی در مطالعات کارآزمایی بالینی: از تئوری تا عمل

Background & Aim: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are studies which are able to provide the most valid evidence to compare various interventions in health research. Biases can affect the quality of research and ultimately make the results of a study invalid. One of the most important biases is selection bias. The best way to reduce selection bias is the use of random allocation. The aim of th...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 8  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015